이 제품에 대해 글로벌 공급망 인텔리전스 네트워크에 수출업체 286개와 수입업체 285개가 색인되어 있습니다.
532건의 공급업체·제조사 연계 거래가 상위 20개 국가에 걸쳐 요약되어 있습니다.
프리미엄 공급업체·제조사 0개와 카탈로그 0건이 현재 등록되어 있습니다.
도매 샘플 항목: 0건; 산지가 샘플 항목: 0건.
이 페이지 데이터셋의 최신 기준 연도는 2024입니다.
페이지 데이터 최종 업데이트일: 2026-05-23.
프로폴리스에 대한 글로벌 공급업체·제조사 거래, 수출 활동 및 가격 벤치마크
상위 20개 국가에 걸친 공급업체 연계 거래 532건을 분석하고, 월간 단가 벤치마크로 프로폴리스의 수출 경쟁력과 소싱 리스크를 추적하세요.
프로폴리스 국가별 공급업체 거래 및 수출 모멘텀 전년 대비 변화
프로폴리스의 긍정적/부정적 전년 대비 변화를 비교해 성장하는 공급 시장과 약화되는 수출 경로를 식별하세요.
프로폴리스의 YoY 변동 상위 국가는 일본 (+240.8%), 싱가포르 (+115.9%), 대한민국 (-79.8%)입니다.
프로폴리스 국가별 공급업체 거래 및 단가 요약
2025-06 기준으로 프로폴리스 국가별 거래 건수와 월간 단가/물량을 비교해 공급업체 및 수출 시장 우선순위를 정하세요.
2025-11 기준, 노출 가능한 프로폴리스 거래 단가가 있는 국가는 일본 (318.99 USD / kg), 브라질 (180.18 USD / kg), 미국 (61.50 USD / kg), 호주 (43.68 USD / kg), 뉴질랜드 (30.86 USD / kg), 외 9개국입니다.
Propolis is a resinous bee product ("bee glue") collected from plant resins and widely commercialized globally as a dietary supplement in liquid extracts and solid dosage forms. Supply and product differentiation are strongly tied to botanical origin and resulting chemotypes, with poplar-type propolis widely distributed across temperate regions and Brazilian green/red propolis differentiated by characteristic plant sources. China is frequently described in the scientific literature as the largest producer, while Brazil is a prominent origin for higher-value green propolis products referenced in international trade and supplement markets. Market execution is heavily shaped by authenticity/standardization challenges (high natural compositional variability and adulteration risk) and by safety controls for residues and contaminants in processed consumer products.
Major Producing Countries
중국Frequently described in peer-reviewed literature as the largest global producer; much production is associated with poplar-type propolis.
브라질Well-known for distinct green/red propolis types with specific botanical sources; prominent in international supplement supply chains.
Major Exporting Countries
중국Frequently cited among leading global exporters in academic literature discussing international propolis trade.
브라질Frequently cited among leading global exporters; Brazilian propolis is often described as high-value, with Japan commonly referenced as a key destination.
아르헨티나Cited among leading exporters in academic literature discussing global propolis exporting countries.
칠레Cited among leading exporters in academic literature discussing global propolis exporting countries.
쿠바Cited among leading exporters in academic literature discussing global propolis exporting countries.
우루과이Cited among leading exporters in academic literature discussing global propolis exporting countries.
캐나다Cited among leading exporters in academic literature discussing global propolis exporting countries.
Major Importing Countries
일본Frequently referenced in reviews and industry documentation as a key destination market for Brazilian propolis products.
Specification
Major VarietiesPoplar-type propolis (Populus-derived; common in temperate regions), Brazilian green propolis (Baccharis-type; Baccharis dracunculifolia source), Brazilian red propolis (Dalbergia-type; Dalbergia ecastophyllum source), Mediterranean diterpene-rich propolis (often associated with Cupressus spp.), Clusia-type red propolis (reported for parts of the Caribbean and northern South America)
Physical Attributes
Resinous, sticky material that is brittle when cold and soft/pliable when warm
Color varies widely (brown/green/red) depending on botanical source and harvest context
Aromatic profile varies by origin and is used in sensory screening for quality
Compositional Metrics
Total phenolics and total flavonoids are commonly used as broad quality markers for propolis and propolis extracts, recognizing strong origin-driven variability
Marker-compound approaches are used for specific chemotypes (e.g., artepillin C commonly referenced for Brazilian green propolis; caffeic-acid derivatives and flavonoids commonly referenced for poplar-type propolis)
Analytical fingerprinting (e.g., HPLC/UHPLC, GC–MS, FTIR) is widely used to support authentication and standardization efforts
Grades
ISO 24381:2023 provides specifications for raw bee propolis, including quality requirements and guidance on packaging/marking/labelling, storage, and transportation conditions
International Honey Commission–referenced research methods propose quality criteria for major propolis types (notably poplar-type and Brazilian green propolis), reflecting a chemotype-specific approach
Packaging
Raw propolis commonly traded as blocks/chunks in food-grade bulk packaging for downstream extraction
Liquid extracts commonly packed in light-protective containers (e.g., amber bottles) to support product stability
Dry extracts commonly packed as powders (often with carriers) for capsule/tablet and functional-food applications
ProcessingExtraction solvent and technique materially influence the extracted phenolic profile and the resulting product’s standardization/quality control pathwayProcessed consumer products may be formulated as hydroalcoholic liquids, aqueous liquids, or dry powders derived from concentrated extracts
Supply Chain
Value Chain
Apiary collection of raw propolis (scraping/collection devices) -> cleaning/removal of wax/impurities -> size reduction (often cold milling) -> solvent extraction -> filtration/clarification -> concentration and standardization -> optional drying into powder (often with carrier) -> encapsulation/bottling -> finished-goods QC -> distribution (retail/e-commerce)
Demand Drivers
Consumer demand for immune-support and wellness-positioned supplements
Product differentiation by origin/chemotype (e.g., poplar-type vs Brazilian green/red) and by standardized-marker positioning
Growth in e-commerce and cross-border supplement sales for bee products
Temperature
Handling must minimize heat exposure that softens resin and can complicate filtration and downstream processing; finished products are typically positioned for cool, dry storage away from direct light (requirements and conditions are addressed in international specifications for raw propolis).
Risks
Bee Health And Climate HighPropolis supply depends on healthy Apis mellifera colonies and on consistent access to plant resin sources; shocks that reduce colony strength or alter local resin availability (including climate-related shifts in vegetation and pesticide pressures) can quickly tighten supply and disrupt consistent standardized supplement manufacturing.Diversify origins and chemotypes in sourcing strategies; require apiary-level management documentation and strengthen supplier qualification for environmental and residue risk controls.
Food Safety HighCommercial propolis supplements have documented risks of pesticide residues and heavy metals, reflecting both environmental exposure and in-hive treatments; these contaminants can trigger regulatory action, recalls, and brand damage in supplement channels.Implement batch-level residue and heavy-metal testing aligned to destination-market limits; use risk-based monitoring by origin and season; validate third-party lab competency.
Authenticity And Adulteration HighHigh demand and product variability create incentives for adulteration (e.g., substitution with plant gums/extracts that resemble propolis), undermining buyer trust and raising compliance risk when labels imply specific origin/chemotype.Adopt chemotype-appropriate fingerprinting and marker testing; align specifications to recognized methods and require full supply-chain traceability for origin/chemotype claims.
Standardization And Label Claims MediumBecause propolis composition varies strongly with botanical origin, consistent product standardization is difficult; in addition, supplement claim regimes differ across jurisdictions, increasing risk of non-compliant marketing and import delays.Standardize using clearly defined marker/specification frameworks tied to recognized standards; maintain jurisdiction-specific claim review and compliant labeling for each destination market.
Sustainability
Bee health and colony stressors (disease/parasites, pesticide exposure, and climate-driven forage shifts) can reduce availability of hive products including propolis
Land-use and agricultural chemical regimes around apiaries influence contaminant risk in bee-derived products and can constrain market access for premium/organic positioning
Labor & Social
Smallholder beekeeping participation and variable pricing can create income volatility; buyers often require stronger traceability and QC documentation to access premium supplement channels
FAQ
What are the main commercial types of propolis in global trade?Propolis is often differentiated by chemotype and botanical source. Commonly referenced types include poplar-type propolis (temperate regions), Brazilian green propolis (Baccharis-type), and Brazilian red propolis (Dalbergia-type), with other regional types (e.g., Mediterranean diterpene-rich propolis) also described in the scientific literature.
What are the biggest quality and compliance risks for propolis supplements?Key risks include contaminant residues (pesticides and heavy metals) found in some commercial products, authenticity/adulteration issues in high-demand markets, and the difficulty of standardizing a naturally variable product across different origins and chemotypes. These risks directly affect regulatory compliance, buyer acceptance, and brand safety.
Is there an international standard for propolis specifications?Yes for raw propolis: ISO 24381:2023 specifies requirements and methods for bee propolis. For propolis extracts used in supplements, ISO has a separate work item (ISO/AWI 13508) that is under development for extract specifications.