브라질 단백질 쉐이크 가격 및 무역 — 마켓 오버뷰 2026

원재료

유단백 농축물, 소금

HS 코드

210690

최종 업데이트

2026-09-27

서치 및 소싱 팀을 위한 핵심 요약

수출 파트너 국가 5개와 수입 파트너 국가 5개가 랭킹되어 있습니다.
이 페이지 데이터셋의 최신 기준 연도는 2024입니다.
페이지 데이터 최종 업데이트일: 2026-09-27.

브라질의 단백질 쉐이크 수출 공급업체·제조사 인텔리전스, 가격 동향, 무역 흐름

Supply Chain Intelligence 기업 프로필 및 분석으로 브라질의 단백질 쉐이크 수출업체 커버리지, 파트너 품질, 경로 우선순위를 검증하세요.

브라질 내 단백질 쉐이크의 연간 수출 금액, 물량 및 공급업체 시장 규모 (HS 코드 210690)

브라질의 단백질 쉐이크 수출 물량/금액 3년치를 분석해 공급 측 시장 성장, 계절성, 무역 변동성을 평가하세요.

연도	물량	금액
2024	72,297,834	478,325,258 USD
2023	67,290,051	457,571,154 USD
2022	72,039,184	435,597,831 USD

브라질에서 수출되는 단백질 쉐이크의 주요 수출 대상 시장 (HS 코드 210690) 2024

2024년 기준, 브라질발 단백질 쉐이크 수출의 상위 목적지국 5개 전반에서 수출 물량과 금액을 비교하세요.

순위	국가	물량	금액
1	볼리비아	5,887,139	90,412,773 USD
2	미국	10,208,480.718	58,817,682 USD
3	베네수엘라	3,627,296	47,737,546 USD
4	파라과이	8,074,331	46,663,096 USD
5	콜롬비아	4,625,963	32,729,977 USD

소싱 진단

브라질산 단백질 쉐이크, 우리도 들여올 수 있을까요?

필요한 스펙과 물량만 알려주세요. 실제로 소싱이 되는지, 어떤 원산지와 공급사가 맞는지 짚어드려요.

무료 진단, 계정 없이 이용 가능합니다.

브라질의 단백질 쉐이크 수입 바이어 인텔리전스 및 가격 시그널: 바이어, 수요, 거래 파트너

수출업체와 수입업체는 Supply Chain Intelligence 기업 프로필 및 분석으로 브라질의 단백질 쉐이크 구매 수요, 파트너 밀도, 다운스트림 채널을 분석할 수 있습니다.

브라질 내 단백질 쉐이크의 연간 수입 금액, 물량 및 수요 규모 (HS 코드 210690)

브라질의 단백질 쉐이크 수입 물량/금액 3년치를 추적해 수요 성장과 시장 모멘텀을 평가하세요.

연도	물량	금액
2024	50,938,775	427,922,959 USD
2023	47,645,038	358,615,307 USD
2022	45,929,274	306,008,846 USD

브라질에 단백질 쉐이크를 공급하는 주요 원산지 공급국 (HS 코드 210690) 2024

2024년 기준, 브라질로 단백질 쉐이크를 공급하는 상위 원산 공급국 5개 전반의 수입 물량과 금액을 비교하세요.

순위	국가	물량	금액
1	우루과이	3,205,775	86,742,579 USD
2	네덜란드	17,299,682	75,357,356 USD
3	미국	1,968,823.238	33,839,642 USD
4	중국	4,531,282.452	27,203,855 USD
5	아르헨티나	3,091,315	23,053,529 USD

수출 진단

우리 단백질 쉐이크, 이 브라질 바이어들에게 팔 수 있을까요?

만드시는 제품만 알려주시면 됩니다. 지금 수출할 준비가 됐는지, 어느 시장이 맞는지 봐드려요.

무료 진단, 계정 없이 이용 가능합니다.

가격 데이터

브라질 단백질 쉐이크 가격, 어디까지 필요하세요?

전체 가격 히스토리와 경쟁사 벤치마크를 열어드립니다. 어떤 숫자가 필요하신지만 말씀해 주시면 함께 살펴봐 드려요.

Classification

Product TypeProcessed Food

Product FormReady-to-drink (RTD)

Industry PositionDietary Supplement / Functional Beverage

Market

Protein shakes in Brazil are sold as ready-to-drink functional beverages and as sports-nutrition supplements, with strong demand tied to fitness and convenience use-cases. The market is primarily served by domestic manufacturing and local co-packing, alongside imports of specialized ingredients and some finished products. Regulatory positioning is a core commercial constraint: products may fall under ANVISA’s dietary supplement framework and/or MAPA oversight for dairy-based beverages, shaping labeling, permitted ingredients, and claims. Given Brazil’s large geography and price-sensitive retail, bulky RTD formats favor local production and efficient national distribution networks.

Market RoleLarge domestic consumer market with significant local manufacturing; ingredient imports support formulations

Domestic RoleMainly domestic consumption with local manufacturing across dairy and sports-nutrition categories

Specification

Physical Attributes

Single-serve RTD bottles or aseptic cartons for on-the-go consumption
Mainstream flavors (e.g., chocolate/vanilla) with low-sugar variants positioned for fitness consumers

Compositional Metrics

Protein content and serving-based nutrition claims must align with Brazilian labeling and claim rules
Allergen disclosure is critical for milk/soy-based formulations

Packaging

Aseptic cartons (UHT shelf-stable formats)
PET bottles for RTD
Sachets or tubs for powder mix variants (channel-dependent)

Supply Chain

Value Chain

Protein ingredients (whey/milk or plant proteins) → blending and standardization → heat treatment (typically UHT for shelf-stable RTD) → homogenization → aseptic filling/packaging → national distribution → retail/e-commerce

Temperature

Shelf-stable UHT RTD formats reduce cold-chain dependency for nationwide distribution
Refrigerated protein beverages (when sold chilled) require continuous cold-chain execution across long-haul trucking routes

Shelf Life

Shelf life is strongly format-dependent (aseptic shelf-stable vs. refrigerated); label and storage-condition compliance is operationally important for national distribution.

Freight IntensityHigh

Transport ModeMultimodal

Risks

Regulatory Compliance HighMisclassification (food vs. dairy beverage vs. dietary supplement) and non-compliant ingredient/claim positioning under ANVISA and/or MAPA pathways can result in import licensing failure, product seizure, forced relabeling, fines, or recall in Brazil.Confirm the intended regulatory category early (ANVISA and/or MAPA), lock formula against permitted-ingredient rules, and pre-approve Portuguese label and claims with a Brazil-qualified regulatory specialist before shipment/launch.

Food Safety MediumProtein supplements globally face elevated scrutiny for adulteration, contamination, and undeclared allergens; any non-conformity can trigger rapid enforcement action and reputational damage in pharmacy and e-commerce channels.Implement supplier qualification for protein inputs, routine contaminant/allergen testing, and strong batch traceability with retained samples; require third-party audited food-safety systems for co-packers.

Logistics MediumBrazil’s long-haul distribution and fuel-price volatility can materially affect RTD delivered cost and service levels; port congestion or documentation issues can further disrupt imports of finished goods or specialty ingredients.Favor local manufacturing/co-packing for bulky RTD where feasible; build safety stock for critical inputs; run pre-shipment document checks aligned to broker/importer requirements.

Sustainability MediumSoy- and cattle-linked deforestation narratives tied to Brazil can create buyer pushback and compliance-driven sourcing constraints for protein shake brands using soy proteins or dairy inputs with weak land-use assurance.Adopt deforestation-risk screening for soy inputs and credible supplier assurance; document land-use policies and traceability evidence for downstream customers.

Sustainability

Brazil soy supply-chain deforestation and land-use change concerns (Amazon/Cerrado) can create reputational and downstream customer due-diligence pressure for soy-protein formulations and soy-derived inputs.
Dairy/whey carbon footprint (enteric methane) and broader climate-impact scrutiny can affect buyer requirements for dairy-based protein shake lines.
Single-serve packaging waste and recyclability expectations can drive packaging redesign or EPR-related compliance workstreams.

Labor & Social

Labor-rights and forced-labor risks periodically documented in parts of Brazil’s agricultural supply chains (including cattle ranching and some crop production) can create due-diligence exposure for upstream inputs used in protein shake formulations.
Contract manufacturing and third-party logistics compliance (working hours, safety, subcontracting practices) can become audit points for multinational or modern-trade programs.

Standards

HACCP
ISO 22000
FSSC 22000
GMP (food and/or dietary supplement manufacturing)

FAQ

What is the biggest regulatory risk for selling protein shakes in Brazil?The biggest risk is getting the regulatory category and claims wrong (food vs. dairy beverage vs. dietary supplement). If the formula, labeling, or claims do not align with ANVISA and/or MAPA requirements, products can be blocked at import, forced into relabeling, or removed from the market.

Which sales channels are most important for protein shakes in Brazil?Protein shakes commonly sell through pharmacies/drugstores, specialty supplement stores, e-commerce (marketplaces and direct-to-consumer), and supermarkets/hypermarkets. The balance depends on whether the product is RTD (often modern trade and pharmacy) or powder (often e-commerce and specialty).

Why do companies often manufacture RTD protein shakes locally in Brazil?RTD protein shakes are bulky and freight-intensive, and Brazil’s long-haul domestic distribution makes logistics costs and service levels critical. Local manufacturing or co-packing can reduce landed-cost exposure versus importing finished RTD and can improve nationwide availability.