Norway: Curfews are the opposite of animal welfare

게시됨 2021년 8월 26일

Tridge 요약

A curfow has been reintroduced in two counties and 37 municipalities in Eastern Norway due to bird flu findings in wild birds. Despite the Norwegian Food Safety Authority's promise to lift or reduce the curfow if the infection decreases, it remains in place. Critics argue that the curfow is an insult to animals and pet owners, as it traps birds in summer heat with limited access to air. They also question the authority's claims that outgoing domestic birds can infect commercial facilities and refuse to deal with documentation from abroad that contradicts their views. The article suggests that the solution is not to lock more birds inside cramped conditions and questions the authority's rejection of exemption applications, implying a controlled phase-out of small-scale animal husbandry in favor of more industrial operations.

면책 조항: 위의 요약은 정보 제공 목적으로 Tridge 자체 학습 AI 모델에 의해 생성되었습니다.

원본 콘텐츠

Following the discovery of wild birds with bird flu in Holmestrand and Vestby municipalities early this summer, a curfew was reintroduced in two counties and 37 municipalities in Eastern Norway. The Norwegian Food Safety Authority has repeatedly promised to lift or reduce the curfew if the infection decreases, but this does not happen. Despite few and sporadic findings, with the latest findings on July 29, and most municipalities not affected at all, the zone is neither reduced nor abolished. The Norwegian Food Safety Authority believes that they have a professional basis for maintaining the large zone. At the same time, they claim that they have no professional basis for stopping bird hunting in the same area. They are not worried that geese that are driven on an early migration will bring infection to new areas. Then they only introduce a curfew in several counties. This is an insult to animals and pet owners. Thousands of birds have been trapped in the summer heat, having first ...

출처: Bondebladet