Karnataka farmer Chowda Reddy's experience with a defaulting aggregator highlights the challenges faced by farmers due to the 2020 amendment to the APMC Act. The amendment, similar to farm laws in Gujarat, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu, and still in effect despite the central laws' repeal, has led to the creation of two distinct markets for agricultural produce: regulated APMC markets and unregulated direct purchase centers.
This amendment has resulted in a significant drop in produce arrivals and APMC revenue, leading to the layoff of half of the contractual staff in these markets. Despite these challenges, some APMCs have shown success, such as those specializing in tomatoes, chillies, and copra. Social activists suggest that supporting farmers and improving transparency within APMC markets can combat malpractices and enhance their effectiveness. They also recommend the establishment of more APMCs and simplifying licensing procedures to increase participation and address the shortcomings of the current model.