Russia: the report on the excess of glycidol in palm oil was partially unreliable

The article clarifies the misinformation spread on social media about the safety of palm oil sold in Russia, stating that the claims of unregulated imports and harmful impurities were partially discredited. It corrects the misconception that Russia lacks import controls, explaining that since 2010, it has implemented numerous regulations and controls to ensure food safety and quality, including palm oil. These regulations cover production, transportation, storage, and labeling, with strict compliance required for palm oil to enter the country.

Furthermore, the article debunks the assertions from a 2019 Moskovsky Komsomolets article about the presence of carcinogenic glycidyl ethers in palm oil, highlighting the lack of solid evidence to support this claim. It notes that the World Health Organization does not classify glycidyl ethers as a carcinogen for humans and that Russia currently does not restrict their content in food products. The article also mentions ongoing discussions about potential changes to these regulations to reduce glycidyl ethers in vegetable oils.

In summary, the article provides a comprehensive and factual response to the misinformation spread about the safety of palm oil in Russia, correcting common misconceptions and providing evidence to support the assertions that palm oil imports undergo rigorous controls and that the claims about harmful impurities in palm oil were unsubstantiated.