USA: EATS Act could take a bite out of Prop 12

게시됨 2023년 6월 16일

Tridge 요약

The Supreme Court's decision on California's Proposition 12, which mandates certain animal housing standards for pork products sold in the state, has sparked a new legislative battle. Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) and Rep. Ashley Hinson (R-IA) have introduced the 'Ending Agriculture Trade Suppression' Act (EATS Act), aimed at preventing states from imposing production practices beyond their borders. This proposal has sparked concern among animal activists and farmers, with arguments about state rights and the potential impact on humane farming practices. The outcome of this legislative battle could significantly influence the agricultural sector, particularly in states that are major pork producers.
면책 조항: 위의 요약은 정보 제공 목적으로 Tridge 자체 학습 AI 모델에 의해 생성되었습니다.

원본 콘텐츠

California’s market for bacon and other pork products is large enough that a May 11 Supreme Court decision apparently has not ended the fight over Proposition 12. The conservative tilt to that decision was that barring any federal statutory or constitutional restrictions, California is free to put its own dictates on meat sold in the state. Proposition 12 regulates animal housing requirements that must be followed for access to the California market, meaning that products produced outside of the state must comply with the law. The state that represents about 15 percent of the U.S. market for bacon and other pork products. Animal activists, who’ve guided Prop 12 since voters approved it in 2018, are now upset because their Supreme Court victory could be lost by legislative action. “Ending Agriculture Trade Suppression” is the title of a new bill just introduced by Sen. Roger Marshall, R-KS. This new EATS Act (an often-used name for legislation regarding certain food topics) blocks ...

더 깊이 있는 인사이트가 필요하신가요?

귀사의 비즈니스에 맞춤화된 상세한 시장 분석 정보를 받아보세요.
'쿠키 허용'을 클릭하면 통계 및 개인 선호도 산출을 위한 쿠키 제공에 동의하게 됩니다. 개인정보 보호정책에서 쿠키에 대한 자세한 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.