China expects ag anti-dumping cases played by Beijing's rules

게시됨 2020년 9월 9일

Tridge 요약

The article highlights the ongoing trade tensions between Australia and China, with a particular focus on the agricultural export industries. It discusses the loss of the Australian grain industry's argument against China's claims of dumping and the resulting 80% import penalties on Australian malt barley. Chinese law specialist Dr Weihuan Zhou suggests that Australian agribusinesses need to present their cases more effectively to Beijing, advising that insufficient legal representation may have contributed to the grain industry's failure. The article also touches on China's deliberate technical disruptions to agricultural trade, which are perceived as political messages to the Australian government. Additionally, it discusses China's investigation into anti-dumping duties and countervailing duties on Australian wine, attributed to a significant increase in Australian wine imports, which has led to concerns about the future of Australia's agricultural exports to China. Rabobank forecasts a decline in Australia's food and agribusiness sales to China due to factors like seasonal fluctuations, trade competition, and political issues. The article underscores the importance of diversifying overseas sales relationships to mitigate the potential impact of these trade tensions.
면책 조항: 위의 요약은 정보 제공 목적으로 Tridge 자체 학습 AI 모델에 의해 생성되었습니다.

원본 콘텐츠

As tensions with politically touchy China seem to grow more tense by the week, Australia's agricultural export industries are being urged to think more carefully about playing their trade cards by Beijing's rules. In particular our defence of the anti-dumping case against Australia's $1.1 billion export wine trade to mainland China should take a much more pragmatic and legal approach, according to Chinese law specialist Dr Weihuan Zhou at the University of NSW. He believed one reason the grain industry lost its seemingly unequivocal argument against China's claim Australian exporters had dumped barley at discounted prices was that agribusiness exporters did not engage enough international legal firepower to present their case to Beijing in a way China would expect to deal with the dispute. He understood no exporter involved in that case engaged the sort of international legal representation which would have suggested to Chinese authorities that dumping issues were being taken as ...

더 깊이 있는 인사이트가 필요하신가요?

귀사의 비즈니스에 맞춤화된 상세한 시장 분석 정보를 받아보세요.
'쿠키 허용'을 클릭하면 통계 및 개인 선호도 산출을 위한 쿠키 제공에 동의하게 됩니다. 개인정보 보호정책에서 쿠키에 대한 자세한 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.