Overexploitation, lack of information, and maximum pelagic catches in Argentina

게시됨 2023년 10월 16일

Tridge 요약

The last Kirchnerist administration in Argentina has left a lack of predictability and loss of information on the National Institute for Fisheries Research and Development (INIDEP), leading to the suspension of campaigns for species like hubbsi hake, squid, and shrimp. This lack of data also affects other species with less economic impact on large companies. Despite the lack of data, models are being used to establish catch limits for mackerel and anchovy, and suggested maximum catches for these species were approved by the Federal Fisheries Council.
면책 조항: 위의 요약은 정보 제공 목적으로 Tridge 자체 학습 AI 모델에 의해 생성되었습니다.

원본 콘텐츠

If the last Kirchnerist administration will leave anything as an imprint on INIDEP, it will be the lack of predictability and its consequent loss of information due to the suspension of campaigns. This has happened with species of utmost economic and social importance such as hubbsi hake, squid and even shrimp in the last two years. But if this happens with the three main resources of Argentine fishing, we can already imagine what happens to other species such as the varied coastal species or pelagic species, which have a minor impact on the economy of large companies. The note presented by the INIDEP mackerel evaluation group reflects this: the status of this resource cannot be established in one of its stocks because there is no data. Despite this and with the creativity that politicians have forced biologists to develop, models are applied to try to establish catch limits that are expected to be sufficiently precautionary. With the available data, the researchers suggested the ...

더 깊이 있는 인사이트가 필요하신가요?

귀사의 비즈니스에 맞춤화된 상세한 시장 분석 정보를 받아보세요.
'쿠키 허용'을 클릭하면 통계 및 개인 선호도 산출을 위한 쿠키 제공에 동의하게 됩니다. 개인정보 보호정책에서 쿠키에 대한 자세한 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.