Foreign ships continue to enter Peruvian waters without control, they say

Published 2024년 10월 8일

Tridge summary

The Peruvian government's efforts to control foreign vessels entering Peruvian waters using Supreme Decree No. 014-2024 and the Sisesat monitoring system have been criticized by the National Society of Artisanal Fishing of Peru (Sonapescal) and the Fisheries and Aquaculture Committee of the National Society of Industries (SNI) for not effectively preventing illegal fishing. These organizations claim that since the decree's implementation, 26 unmonitored Chinese squid fishing boats have entered Peruvian waters, despite the requirements of the decree. They also point out flaws in the decree, such as the absence of homologation for satellite positioning signals from foreign ships and the potential for bypassing the Sisesat requirement in certain situations. The issue is exacerbated by the perceived inefficiency of the Minister of Production, Sergio González, who Sonapescal is calling for to resign due to his perceived inaction against illegal fishing activities. This situation is part of a larger problem that is estimated to result in the loss of 60 million kilos of squid annually, valued at around US$ 100 million.
Disclaimer:The above summary was generated by Tridge's proprietary AI model for informational purposes.

Original content

The measures taken by the Government of Dina Boluarte to tighten satellite control of foreign vessels entering the Peruvian sea have not fulfilled their central objective. According to the National Society of Artisanal Fishing of Peru (Sonapescal), since the entry into force of Supreme Decree No. 014-2024 until Friday, October 5, the entry of 26 squid fishing boats from China was recorded, 24 of which set sail without proving the installation of the monitoring system known as Sisesat. Although the Navy and the Ministry of Production deny this situation, fishermen and specialists affirm the opposite. Elsa Vega, president of Sonapescal, believes that the norm presents a series of gaps. One of them is the homologation of the satellite positioning signal emitted by foreign ships and the other refers to the option of not requiring Sisesat in cases of forced arrivals or use of port services for security. “There is no sign of change. It was assumed that, if the regulations were already ...
Source: Larepublica

Would you like more in-depth insights?

Gain access to detailed market analysis tailored to your business needs.
By clicking “Accept Cookies,” I agree to provide cookies for statistical and personalized preference purposes. To learn more about our cookies, please read our Privacy Policy.