Herring fishermen cautiously optimistic after US Supreme Court hears arguments on at-sea observer requirements

Published 2024년 1월 19일

Tridge summary

The New Civil Liberties Alliance is cautiously optimistic about the U.S. Supreme Court's alignment with their reasoning in a case representing commercial fishermen. The case involves fishermen suing the government over being required to pay for at-sea monitors, which they argue is financially unfair. The court is reevaluating the Chevron deference, which gives wide latitude to agencies like NOAA Fisheries, and a decision is expected in early summer.
Disclaimer:The above summary was generated by Tridge's proprietary AI model for informational purposes.

Original content

The New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA), which has been representing commercial fishermen in an ongoing case before the U.S. Supreme Court, expressed cautious optimism that the court would align with their reasoning following oral arguments.“After many years, our clients were finally before a court that seemed disinclined to defer to the agency they have been fighting as to what the law is,” NCLA Senior Litigation Counsel John Veccione said.The case began in 2020 when NOAA Fisheries began requiring some fishermen to pay for at-sea monitors on their vessels out of pocket. Claiming that monitors cost them more than USD 700 (EUR 640) per day, some New Jersey herring fishermen sued the government, arguing that the New England Fishery Management Council did not have legal authority to make them pay for the monitors.“This case has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with protecting the livelihoods of my family and crew,” Plaintiff Bill Bright said. “There are substantial ...

Would you like more in-depth insights?

Gain access to detailed market analysis tailored to your business needs.
By clicking “Accept Cookies,” I agree to provide cookies for statistical and personalized preference purposes. To learn more about our cookies, please read our Privacy Policy.