Tridge summary
The Supreme Court decided by 8 to 2 to maintain the validity of the tax benefits for agrochemicals, rejecting actions that questioned Convention 100/1997 and Constitutional Amendment 132/2023, maintaining the reduction of ICMS for these agricultural inputs in Brazil.
Original content
The Supreme Federal Court (STF) decided this Thursday (18) to maintain the validity of the granting of fiscal benefits for agrochemicals. The Court judged two actions that were filed by the PV and PSOL parties. The parties questioned the validity of the Agreement No. 100 of 1997, of the National Council of Fiscal Policy (Confaz), and the Constitutional Amendment (EC) 132 of 2023. The rules allowed the application of a differentiated taxation regime for agrochemicals and a reduction of 60% in the rates of the Tax on Circulation of Goods and Services (ICMS) on the products. By 8 votes to 2, the Court judged the actions as unfounded and understood that the exemption of taxes on the commercialization of agrochemicals cannot be considered unconstitutional. The votes for the maintenance of ...
Source: Agrolink
Would you like more in-depth insights?
Gain access to detailed market analysis tailored to your business needs.
Related market data
What to read next
Read more relevant content
By clicking “Accept Cookies,” I agree to provide cookies for statistical and personalized preference purposes. To learn more about our cookies, please read our Privacy Policy.